Metering 2.0: New Decimal, Old Dilemmas, More Jargon?

For years, we’ve been promised a smarter grid. At the centre of that promise sits the meter. It used to be a plastic box with a spinning wheel. Today it is a glossy device meant to stream data, connect homes, and even orchestrate devices.

But as with every tech refresh, “smarter” has not always meant “better.” Data into apps, dashboards, and services. It is a great pitch. It is also where the story starts to wobble:

• In parts of the UK, first-generation smart meters often went “dumb” after supplier switches until they were migrated to new infrastructure. Households fell back to manual reads and trust suffered.
• In Australia, Victoria’s rollout struggled to deliver the promised cost benefit for years. Hardware landed, but many customers did not see clear value.
• In the United States, home area networking and in-home displays sat on spec sheets, yet enrollment and usage stayed low without simple offers and obvious savings.

None of this says meters are bad. It says plumbing alone does not deliver outcomes. When data is unreliable, devices do not interoperate, enrollment is clunky, or tariffs do not reward automation, the value leaks out.

AMI explained and what the AMI 2.0 concept is meant to mean

Before we judge, it helps to define the stack we already have and the one we are trying to build.

Advanced Metering Infrastructure is more than the box on the wall. It includes the meter, the network that carries its data, such as RF mesh, cellular, or power line, and the head-end systems that collect reads and handle remote tasks like connect or disconnect, firmware, and keys. In the first wave, AMI 1.0 digitised metering. Utilities moved to hourly or half-hourly reads, gained visibility of outages and voltage, and cut truck rolls. That plumbing upgrade worked.

The new generation Advanced Metering Infrastructure (termed broadly as '2.0') is touted as lifting the ceiling. Instead of once an hour, data can arrive every five to fifteen minutes with richer events. The meter gains a small amount of secure edge intelligence so a few functions do not require a round trip to the cloud. Interfaces to the home become more standardised through HAN or BAN so EV chargers, heat pumps, batteries, and rooftop solar can be coordinated. In spirit, that is the shift. We move from metering to a flexibility platform. The meter does not only measure. It is meant to help the home and the grid move in sync.

On paper that sounds like progress. In practice the gaps between layers decide whether anyone feels the benefit.

Where Smart Metering Meets the Home

The ideal day is easy to picture. It is also easy to derail.

• Your EV finishes charging before peak prices begin.
• Your heat pump pre-warms when wind and solar are abundant.
• Your water heater rides through a critical peak without you noticing.

Here is what trips us up in the real world.

• Standards are overlapping rather than aligned. Zigbee SE, Wi-SUN, Thread or Matter, IEEE 2030.5 or CSIP, and OpenADR work well in isolation. Together they often need gateways and translations.
• Utility readiness varies. Many teams are still building platforms, staffing models, and commercial playbooks that turn high-frequency data into live automated programs.
• Latency is not optional. AMI is not a sub-second control bus. Time-critical actions only work when device-side automation carries the load and the signals are crystal clear (AMI intervals are typically 15–60 minutes, sometimes 5–15 in advanced deployments: DOE AMI summary
• Customer experience is the hinge. If enrollment is not near one tap with obvious value, participation stalls. If a device or in-home display fails, trust evaporates.
• Tariffs and incentives must be visible and simple. If the signal is muddy, the automation sits idle.

The north star is outcomes, not spec sheets. AMI in its latest form earns its keep when signals and data translate into automatic control of at least one big device in the home.

• Offers that make sense at a glance. Clear rewards and rules. No acronym soup.
• Enrollment measured in minutes, not weeks. Value visible within days, not months.
• Dependable pathways between utility, platform, and OEMs with real latency and availability expectations plus graceful fallbacks.
• Data that is handled with restraint. Explicit consent, scoped access, minimal retention.
• Edge intelligence used where it protects safety and quality. Voltage and phase awareness in the meter. The rest where it can evolve quickly.

When the design is this simple, the technology fades into the background and the benefits do not.

Why Smart Meters Should Not Try to Do Everything

Hardware cycles lose to software cycles. That is the uncomfortable truth.

• Meters live on ten to fifteen year refresh timelines.
• EV chargers, heat pumps, batteries, and smart panels evolve every twelve to twenty four months.
• Cramming future use cases into the meter freezes today’s assumptions into tomorrow’s infrastructure.

Use the meter for the things it is best at.

• Trusted identity and settlement-grade measurement such as kWh, voltage, phase, and events.
• Secure telemetry uplink such as intervals and critical events.
• Safety-critical edge awareness such as basic power quality, tamper, and outage.

Everything else belongs in faster-moving layers that can learn, iterate, and swap.

What Success Looks Like for AMI 2.0

AMI 2.0 makes the meter smarter. That is real progress. It is not yet the outcome. The path to visible value is simple to say and hard to do. Tariffs must meet automation. Standards must meet real devices. Programs must meet human behavior. Keep the meter focused on measurement and safety. Let best-of-breed platforms and devices handle the choreography. That is how lower bills, real flexibility, and happier customers show up in the living room, not just on the roadmap.

About the Author (Matt Wapples)

By day, Matt Wapples helps utilities and customers unlock the power of distributed energy resources. By night, he blends curiosity, logic, and a touch of chaos to make sense of technology, markets, and the future of power.

His perspective is built on deep experience across the energy and technology sector. He has worked for a utility, advised through consultancy, and helped scale distributed energy platforms internationally. Alongside this, he completed an Executive MBA at Imperial College London, adding a strategic and global lens to hands-on industry knowledge.

Beyond energy, Matt has always kept one foot in exploration and entrepreneurship. He taught scuba diving in Thailand during a year out, and ran Feiyue sneakers into Europe, securing partnerships with major retailers including Urban Outfitters.

Life and work have taken him across London, Germany, Thailand, Singapore, Tokyo, and now Atlanta. That journey has shaped a global perspective and a restless curiosity.

Follow his work on LinkedIn